> But really, am I missing something?
I think the only thing we're missing is an authoritative legal opinion on what effects, if any, Nevada SB 331, 2011, has on the access to gender-designated restrooms. Until that comes out, the situation is subject to misunderstanding and speculation. I have yet to hear anything that comes out of the mouth or keyboard of anyone admitted to the Bar in Nevada regarding this topic.
Layperson interpretation appears to fall into two areas. Some believe that SB 331 is a "free pass" to use the gender-designated restroom of one's choice. Others believe that if a business makes available some facilities, any facilities, to everyone, they are within the letter of the law.
An opinion will most likely eventually come, possibly from the Nevada AG's office, perhaps from a trial court judge. Less-binding opinions may come from private attorneys hired by those with an interest in the topic.
Until an opinion (from an authoritative source) emerges, expect a lot of confusion and misinformation, and yes, continued discrimination.
> Who are the people who said this
The LVRJ article from which this "soundbite" was taken appears here:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/gover ... ation-billThat particular quote reeks of the oh-so-tired putdown game of "101 reasons why I should use the ladies room and you shouldn't" which is sometimes played at various TG gatherings.
The complete text of the bill (not the one primarily referred to in the LVRJ article) appears here:
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/76th ... /SB331.pdfUpon re-reading it, I see absolutely no reference to any of the specific labels of identity which define and divide us.
> and do they have an impact on how the police enforce the law?
No more than you and I have.