Let's please get this out of the way so we can concentrate on productive matters.
This undercurrent seems to come up cyclically, seasoned with a subtle dash of snark in many cases.
There are not many, but there are a few people very persistently saying some very bad things about a very good program and some very good people!
> DLV is probably the most transparent organization I've ever been
> involved with, of course, I'm one of those evil organizers.
We have tried to make this even more so in recent years.
Still, I keep hearing occasional assertions that key decisions about our program are made by an entrenched few from behind closed doors. I and others can assure everyone that this is not the case. Every decision of significance is brought up within our ORG group and if necessary is decided upon by those in that group who hold voting status. There are no "secret committees" as has been implied.
If anyone does not like the way our program is run, anyone in a leadership position, myself included, can be removed by a "recall" motion at any time, as outlined in our Standing Rules. One thing we implemented this year is an annual "vote of confidence" (or of no confidence) for those holding named positions.
Another item that keeps persisting, which is a bit more relevant to the topics at hand, is this notion along the line of "All you do at DLV is eat and drink." Anyone who believes this has obviously never attended or even browsed one of our recent schedules! Well, it could be that someone could do DLV and only do the dining and bar activities, but ... The statement above can easily be refuted (refudiated?) by a quick perusal of the photos on our web site.
Yes, I admit we do have quite a few activities at which adult beverages are served. Why do we have them? Because our people enjoy them!
One chronic criticism I must admit has some basis in fact. In years past we did indeed go too far regarding enforcement of dress guidelines. It was a lesson we learned the hard way. It was trial and error, in response to things getting out of hand, dress and behavior wise, at our 2003 event. Had we done nothing, our program probably would have folded before our 2004 event.
The last of our enforcement train-wrecks is now 10 year old water under the bridge! Let's move on and give it a rest, please!
Our people have, however, made it very clear that they do want us to have standards for dress and behavior (anyone who disagrees, please speak up, and I promise you will not be "verbally and personally attacked by several ORG leadership people" if you do so) but they have also made it very clear that they do not want enforcement to be an overriding theme of our event.
The bottom line is that we try to be as fair and as transparent as we can be, and we've always held to the principle that those who do the work make the decisions. If anyone does not like the way things are being done, they can volunteer to do the job better.