This posting is from: kumiko yvonne watanabe
----------
Please be aware that this discussion was forcefully changed to
"Leadership....."
In the original thread called "Ages" and not repeated in this thread
like other comments of that thread, Annie has finalized it and writes
and I quote:
" > Don't tweak anything. Diva is fine the way it is.
This appears to be what most of those who have answered the
original questions are saying. Thanks. "
----
In this discussion here, its more dynamic, objective, and progressive,
looking objectively at issues, and responses have been made by others.
Two things minimally has been brought up
1. Non-official activity involving DLV attendees:
IF sex and sexuality is currently strictly not allowed in DLV, and that
aspect drives many at Wild Side. That rule has to be modified or
changed. However saying that, it does NOT mean to not have activities to
socialize in a way to lead to that, but leaving having consensual sex
outside of the activity, between willing partners. One option already
open is non-official activities that do exactly this result. Also late
night dancing already allows for this too. This is a good starting point
for newer activities for the younger CDers, and like all activities at
DLV, one attends what they want. So the older cders don't have to attend
it. Fine too and they can have their quiet evenings drinking. What about
having a dinner at a night club that goes straight into dancing all
night. How about a party bus instead of a limo tour? What about night
club crawl/tour of different night clubs per night.
2. Don't change anything. Leave it as it is
----
"Who Moved My Cheese" is a excellent book exploring the meaning of
change, and change management. Not changing is given as one
result, and not a good one, but a common response to any form of change,
and is very much reflected in some responses on this issue, so its not
what I or anyone has said, and has been published. Not saying
anything against any person's response. I want to make that clear.
Nothing wrong with any given response as a example of a reason
against change. Basically the book shows the person that didn't
like change wasn't considered a good result, and gave its reasons and
possible results. But the reasoning and focus is to change to
survive. One can see a video version on You Tube if you want to find out
what this book was saying.
----------
(This posting was entered by kumiko yvonne watanabe, an external user of MyDLV.)