> To take this idea one step further. The photo for this 'yearbook' can
> be also used as a ID pic for MyDLV accounts?
I would say that yes it could be used as the "Avatar" photo for MyDLV, but I know that some will not want a yearbook photo and avatar to be one and the same. For example, my own avatar is an ASCII caricature and I would want the yearbook photo to be one of me in real life. I think a user-designated photo is the way to go.
> Annie, if this idea is already in play for MyDLV, or too much work to
> set up the webpage html or some form of C programing, my apologies.
It was not in play until this morning. Yes, it will take some programming, but if it will be used, I'm willing to do it. Very few web apps are written in c anymore. The bulk of the front end of MyDLV is written in PHP, a somewhat c-like interpreted scripting language with some otherwise very vanilla .html templates. The back end relies heavily on a Postgres database with a fair amount of shell script cgi. I'm sure I'm boring most of the folks with this.
> I still think a web page with individual head shots - big enough to see
> the faces nicely - but not too close to see things you don't want to see
> (ie beard shadow - nose hairs - etc) and all even so the size of the
> head is about the same with all the pics, just big enough to see their
> face nicely. The pics will have to have a minimum of pixel size so that
> tweeking the photo bigger or smaller won't affect the overall image to
> greatly/.
I want to adhere to Ginger's principle of keeping things simple. Leverage what we already have and let the user decide what type of photo and what final size to use. Of course the yearbook page will have thumbnails, standardized in size. As we do in the gallery, we'll resize anything really large to sane dimensions. (The Netpbm toolkit us used for image manipulation here.)
> I know that some of us who don't want to have their pic or name posted,
> so it would still be a voluntary thing to do. Or do like some some
> yearbooks that have a sign - "photo not available."
I envision this as opt in only. No opt in (meaning no yearbook photo selected), no photo, no mention.
> On some of the photos in the pic gallery are very nice photos, but for
> others, usually in group shots, some faces can be very small or even
> hard to see - because of lighting or other factors, its hard to tell
> who they are, even if clicking on them, or expanded the pixel size
> makes the pic bigger. At times its makes the pic blurred.
When we get our 2011 pages on line, we'll have close to 14,000 photos in our galleries. All of these are available to our users to post in their personal galleries if they wish.
These photos are taken using a wide range of cameras, from cell phone cams to "prosumer" grade equipment. The quality of the photos varies from sub-snapshot quality to presentation quality. Most of the photos are casual snapshots showing one or more of our attendees.
It's really going to have to be up to the individual to choose their yearbook photo and get it formatted the way they like best.