by External Poster » Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:43 pm
This posting is from: kumiko yvonne watanabe
----------
`
I read both "Gina" emails.
> I just can't let go my shock over YOUR (you know who you are) behavior
No, I'm not the one you are referring too by the above statement.
But I was there that night on the bar, having a nice drink and trying to
win on the video poker machine.
To the person and Lady, who was asked to leave, I have the greatest
respect and thank you for your understanding and cooperation and
how you handled the situation with class. I also saw how you were
dressed.
By your actions, you are indeed a very good representative of the Wildside.
DLV is different from Wildside, and we should respect our differences.
This was also a scheduled DLV event. If this person writing
this email was a registered attendee of the DLV, then she should
have known about our guidelines and requirements.
Since you are part of this DLV discussion, you must be a registered
attended and should known about and reviewd the guidelines for
attending DLV events.
Did you invite the members of Wildside to our Charles Bar event?
The person who was asked to leave, her attire was already creating a
reaction by the casino security, and had the potential of negatively
affecting all that were attending the bar at that time including
Wildside, DLV, and a visiting group from England, and possibly ruin the
evening for everyone.
The other Gina reported that the Bartender was called by the casino
security about that person. This gives independent proof that the outfit
this person was wearing was raising the warning flags of security as not
a acceptable outfit to be worn in the Bellagio casino.
What you call the "DLV fashion police" were there to protect the other
attendees at the Allegro (Charles) Bar to prevent possible actions by
the casino. Other attendees did or would have complained about how
this person was dressed to these people you call 'fashion police",
telling them about how that person was dressed, and the negative impact
and attention that person was making on them, trying to enjoy the
event. So it really wasn't someone singling out someone, its more of a
collective group of people that have agreed to dress and behave a
certain way, reporting a violation of an agreed set of guidelines.
The BDR guidelines for DLV are to protect all attendees of DLV and those
around us, so that there is little or no negative impact with
mainstream venues or casinos or other public people in our area.
One reason for the guidelines and requirements are for the LOCALs that
live in LV. Wearing outfits that brings unwanted attention and
negative action by the casino and their security staff will later
reflect upon, and make it more difficult in the future, for the local
trans gendered group to use this venue when we leave.
Trans gendered locals that live in LV have to deal with the results of
our actions on a daily basis. They also use many of the venues DLV
uses, and they will have to live with any negative actions directed
against them that was created during a DLV event. This is one of our
reasons, which is for their safety and continued use of mainstream
venues after DLV is over, that we have dress requirements.
> "Isn't that kinda what being a T is all about? Not following rules & standards
> dictated by conventional wisdom? "
The answer is NO, its not. DLV attendees follow rules and standards
dictated by conventional wisdom. If you are a cross dresser or a trans
sexual, and do not want to follow rules and standards of conventional
wisdom, DLV is not and never has been that.
----------
(This posting was entered by kumiko yvonne watanabe, an external user of MyDLV.)