Dress Issue, and merging with great "unwashed"....

Diva Las Vegas Discussion Forum

Return to DLV Discussion Forum



Dress Issue, and merging with great "unwashed"....

Postby External Poster » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:50 am

This posting is from: annie
----------

>These were written quite a few years ago now and as far as
>I'm aware haven't really been changed in that time.

No change to the actual documents as approved in 2003. There
was another item which clarified a few issues, approved in
2008, but it did not rescind or modify any of the original.

>In my opinion the issue crosses the line from being an
>aberration to an issue where an individual does something,
>wears something or says some thing that then has a
>(significant) impact or one or more others.

>One could argue that a BoBeep costume didn't really effect
>others.

As one of those who heard first hand some of the complaints
about what's referred to as the "Bo Peep outfit", I can say
most certainly that others' enjoyment of DLV 2003 was indeed
impacted.

It wasn't really the outfit per se, but a combination of the
outfit and the attention it got in the mainstream, plus the
issues of deportment, alcohol use, and obvious restroom use.
The combination resulted in unease and discomfort among some
of the other attendees, and did result in some mandatory
restroom "arrangements" at one of our hotels.

The outfit itself was quite appropriate for the Flex Lounge,
the venue at which I first remember it, but not for a casino
or the Mandalay Bay.

>How about the 6'12 gurl ... high heels, a very mini mini-skirt
>... anatomical parts dangling ... wig and boobs but no make up
>... tight jeans that clearly show them having a "package" ...

These are the very issues which our BDR guidelines, policies,
and procedures are meant to address.

>A well dressed women stands out and so if, as a CDer you want
>to be "seen", dress up. You'll be guaranteed to be seen however
>if you don't have a high degree of passability, or are with
>others that don't pass well, expect to get more negative than
>positive reaction.

There appears to be a certain degree of naivete and maybe
some wishful thinking in the perceptions our people, and
in particular those who are new to public exposure, have
in regard to the attention they receive from the general
public.

With the exception of our very few younger, smaller and
more passable people who are truly "propositionable" (as
Tony might say) :) :), the reactions of the members of
the general public are far from what one would wish.

>Some years ago, on the limo tour I took pictures of the
>watching crowd rather than the Limo people. ...
>(Annie are those photos on line and which year was it?).

You're probably referring to the "Getting the attention of
the civilians ..." photos of DLV 2005. Go to this page:

http://www.geekbabe.com/dlv/dlv2005/indexn.html

.. select "Activities" and look about 1/2 way down in the
page.

----------
(This posting was entered by annie, an external user of MyDLV.)
External Poster
External
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:37 pm

Return to DLV Discussion Forum



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests