This posting is from: annie
----------
>Was the offender a new gal or a previous attendee?
Newcomer, first time this year.
>But if it was a new attendee, well then perhaps pulling
>her aside away from the others and discretely informing
>her that she is not dressed to code specifications.
This can be done either formally, using the procedures
that are in place, or informally, peer-to-peer.
>If this problem becomes an real hot button issue for the next
>DLV, why can't we solve it by establishing a small group of
>ladies who can handle the offending lady and gently tell her
>she needs to go back to her hotel and change.
>How hard is that?
I don't think we need any new rules, new formalities, or
an "enforcement committee" or anything like that.
I also don't think it's in the best interest of DLV as a
whole to escalate this issue until it warrants the term
"hot button" and such.
What I do think we need is a review and a good understanding,
from the rank and file up to the senior volunteer level, of
such things as what the rules are, to whom they apply and in
what cases they are binding, under what conditions does a
violation actually occur, and a good review of the
responsibilities, including that of the rank and file,
regarding what is to be done if one's behavior or dress
negatively affects another's enjoyment of the event.
We have procedures in place to deal with situations such
as what occurred at the Bahama Breeze, but as far as we
know, these procedures were not followed.
We can only speculate why not, but my guess would be that
those whose enjoyment was negatively affected either did
not know what to do, or knew and for some reason chose not
to make their feelings known at the time something could be
done about their concerns.
The various rules, regulations, policies, and procedures
which cover this are easy to find if you look for them,
but I daresay that very few have actually read them.
Seek and you shall find. :)
(Anybody need a hint as to where to look?) :)
>I think if it is done tactfully... no one should get the
>feathers ruffled. And if they do, well as the saying goes..
>"Oh, well!"
Formal "consultations", throughout our history, have been
awkward at best, and in some cases have turned into an
absolute train wreck! :(
Informal peer-to-peer advice appears to work better, as
indicated on the last several years' surveys. However,
there are a number of reports where such initiatives
were not taken in a positive manner.
. . . . .
Now, from a personal standpoint, I was at the BB and I
saw the outfit in question. My initial thought was that
it was not the best choice of what to wear to such an
activity, but it was in no way impacting my enjoyment
of the activity. The scores for the activity on this
year's survey (4.76 for enjoyment and 4.75 for comfort
with 66 responses) show that there was nothing of
significance reducing the overall enjoyment or comfort
level that night.
It was a case of overdressing, and IMAO, this case was
not nearly as offensive to the eye as were the cases in
our history where 60yo individuals have tried to come
off as the 20yo hottie! Nor do I think this a case of
someone saying "f*ck you" to our guidelines. It was
just a questionable choice of what to wear to such an
activity.
If this was our most severe dress issue this year, I
think we're doing very well, dress wise. :)
----------
(This posting was entered by annie, an external user of MyDLV.)